State ex rel. Pressware International v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Pressware contests the two violations assessed against it. Upon review, we find that the commission abused its- discretion as to Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1 — 5—10(D)(2)(d)(i) only.
Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-5-10(E)(l) provides:
“The employer shall furnish and require the use of hand tools for freeing and removing stuck work or scrap pieces from the dies, so that no employee need reach into the point of operation for such purposes.”
Pressware contends that it provided employees with needle nose pliers and tongs to remove paper jams. Hearing testimony from claimant and Robert Lilly, *288however, indicated that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. United States Steel Corp. v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State ex rel. Go-Jo Industries v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Quality Tower Service, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Richmond v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Sunesis Constr. Co. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Pressware Internatl., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Thompson Elec., L.L.C. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.