Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sunesis Constr. Co. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 2018No. 2015-1773PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

*297 {¶ 1} Appellant, Sunesis Construction Company, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Tenth District Court of Appeals alleging that appellee Industrial Commission abused its discretion when it issued an award of additional compensation for violation of a specific safety requirement ("VSSR") based on Ohio Adm.Code 4123:1-3-13(D)(1), (D)(2), (E)(1), (E)(2), and (E)(4), which regulate trenches and excavations in the construction industry.

{¶ 2} The court of appeals concluded that there was some evidence supporting the commission's decision and denied the writ of mandamus. For the reasons…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Supreme Bumpers, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Quality Tower Service, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Armstrong Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State ex rel. Levitin v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State ex rel. Phlipot v. Doug Smith FarmsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State ex rel. Liberty Steel Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API