Legal Opinion

State v. Hundley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 28, 1994No. 15337-8-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

David Hundley appeals his convictions of possession of cocaine and of heroin. At his bench trial, Hund-ley claimed that he believed the 0.5 grams of green-brown vegetable matter that the police found in his wallet to be incense or potpourri. He farther claimed that he had received the material as an unsolicited free sample from a mail order company. On appeal, Hundley challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. He also contends that the trial court erred in requiring him to bear the burden of proving unwitting possession by a preponderance of the evidence. We reverse.

Facts

In a search incident…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. State v. BalzerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. State v. HundleyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API