State v. Acosta
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether, in a prosecution for second degree assault under RCW 9A.36-.020(l)(b), the State must disprove a defendant's claim of self-defense. The Court of Appeals held that the State need not do so, and affirmed petitioner's conviction. State v. *614Acosta, 34 Wn. App. 387, 661 P.2d 602 (1983). We reverse the Court of Appeals and remand for a new trial.
Petitioner David Acosta met Kimberly Polmateer in a Portland bar on October 13, 1980. They later decided to drive to Vancouver in Polmateer's car. They parked in a dark alley and smoked some marijuana. Petitioner testified…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Luck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.