Legal Opinion

Burke-Tarr Company v. Ferland Corporation

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 10, 1999No. 97-460-AppealPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Justice.

This case arose from a complaint filed by the plaintiff, Burke-Tarr Company (Burke-Tarr), to enjoin the defendant, Ferland Corporation (defendant or Ferland), from using a right-of-way across Burke-Tarr’s property. Following a trial without the intervention of a jury, a Kent County Superior Court trial justice denied Burke-Tarr’s petition for in-junctive and declaratory relief. In addition, the trial justice denied Ferland’s claim that it had acquired a prescriptive easement over the right-of-way, and after a separate trial on damages, awarded Burke-Tarr $66,706.24…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Penn Bowling Recreation Center, Inc. v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Warwick Musical Theatre, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. Wiesel v. SmiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
  4. Capital Properties, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  5. Thomas v. RossSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Carnevale v. DupeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  2. Matter of Dissolution of Anderson, Zangari & BossianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  3. Reitsma v. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Carpenter v. HanslinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  5. Clyne v. DoyleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API