Legal Opinion

Clyne v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 10, 1999No. 98-556-AppealPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this malicious-prosecution and abuse-of-process case, the plaintiff, Patrick B. Clyne, appeals from the entry of judgment for the defendants, William J. Doyle (Doyle) and AAA Mobile Warehousing Company, Inc. (AAA). Following a conference before a single justice of this Court in accordance with Article I, Rule 12A(3)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure, this case was assigned to the full Court for a session in conference for a potential disposition without oral argument. After a careful review of the record and arguments raised by the plaintiff, we affirm.

This case…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hillside Associates v. StravatoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. Brough v. FoleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  3. Burke-Tarr Company v. Ferland CorporationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Solitro v. MoffattSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Palazzo v. AlvesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. Butera v. BoucherSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  3. Toste Farm Corp. v. Hadbury, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Horton v. Portsmouth Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  5. Wright v. ZielinskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API