Legal Opinion
WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Medford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 21, 1962No. 385PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The plaintiffs make these contentions: (1) The limitation of 30 days was not controlling. (2) Mr. Wilson was entitled to reasonable time thereafter for title examination. (3) The tender of the purchase price and the demand for a deed on September 2, 1960, were within a reasonable time. (4) The defendant was estopped to plead failure to give notice and make tender by participating in an effort to clear up the title.
The defendant, on the other hand, contends: (1) The option specifically provided that a demand must be made within 30 days from June 10, 1960. (2) Cash in full, $15,000.00, (less…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Cubbins v. Mississippi River CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Trogden v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Douglass v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Yates v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.