Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 23, 2003No. 26379-3-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
66 P.3d 1119 (2003)
Prince I. JENKINS, Respondent,
v.
Debra PALMER, a single woman, Appellant.
No. 26379-3-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
April 23, 2003.
Diane Frances Russell, Beattie Russell Inc. PS, Silverdale, WA, for Appellant.
William Michael Hanbey, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
SEINFELD, J.
Debra Palmer appeals the dismissal of her counterclaim against Prince I. Jenkins in which she alleged that Jenkins violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination, RCW 49.60 (WLAD). The trial court ruled that the WLAD does not apply to the situation where a co worker,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- Brown v. Scott Paper Worldwide Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Galbraith v. Tapco Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Raymond v. Pacific ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Valdez-Zontek v. Eastmont School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Ellorin v. Applied Finishing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Purcell v. American LegionDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
- Hotchkiss v. CSK Auto Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- Erdman v. Chapel Hill Presbyterian ChurchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.