Legal Opinion
Caudill v. Farmland Industries, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided October 31, 1988No. 86-1014-CV-W-9PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT I
BARTLETT, District Judge.
Defendant Farmland Industries, Inc. has filed a motion for partial summary judgment asserting that: 1) all claims asserted under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. are barred by the statute of limitations; 2) the claim for retaliation under the ADEA should be dismissed because Farmland was not plaintiff’s “employer” when the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred; and 3) the claim for retaliation under the ADEA should be dismissed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Herbert F. CAUDILL, Appellant, v. FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Jenkins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Martin v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Heideman v. PFL, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.