Legal Opinion
Kittitas County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 2011No. 84187-0PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 Kittitas County (County) and several other parties (collectively “Petitioners”) challenge two final *152decisions and orders of the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (Board). The Board found several provisions of the County’s revised comprehensive plan (Plan) and development code noncompliant with the Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW. Petitioners argue that the Board misinterpreted the law and acted beyond its jurisdiction, without substantial evidence, and arbitrarily and capriciously made findings related to rural and agricultural densities and uses, zoning…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Spokane County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. Brian GrandberryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Kittitas County v. Kittitas County Conservation CoalitionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.