Legal Opinion
State v. Ketter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 1985No. C6-84-1078PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING lude^e ’ g '
Appellant was charged with misdemean- or prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.324, subd. 3(1) (1982). She unsuccessfully moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of probable cause and on the ground that the statute was facially unconstitutional.
The case proceeded to trial, and a jury found appellant guilty. She moved for a new trial, alleging evidentiary error and error in refusing to give a requested jury instruction. The trial court denied the motion, and she appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
On September 8,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Mertins v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019