Mertins v. Commissioner of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges a district court order denying his request to reinstate his commercial and recreational fish and game licenses. Appellant argues that his commercial fishing license is a protected property interest that cannot be seized or revoked without due process of law and that the appeal procedure provided for by Minn.Stat. § 97A.420 (2006) violates his right to procedural due process under Article I, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Appellant further contends that, even if section…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015