Henavie v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the trial of this action evidence was given tending to establish the following facts: Eleventh avenue and Forty-fifth street, in the city of New York, cross each other substantially at right angles. In the avenue as it crosses Forty-fifth street, and on an even grade therewith, are two railroad tracks belonging to the defendant, upon which engines are run propelled by steam On the 5th of April, 1895, at about half-past nine in the evening, on a clear night, the plaintiff's intestate, 32 years of age and in the full possession of his faculties so far as appears, started to walk across the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Houghkirk v. President, Managers & Co. of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Massoth v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Greany v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Dyer v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- McClain v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Merback v. BlanchardWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Smith v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Fike v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.