Legal Opinion
Smith v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] For the purposes of this discussion, the defendant's negligence must be deemed to have been established, since it is practically conceded that the evidence as to the speed of the train and the failure to give warning signals of its approach was sufficient to put the defendant to its proof upon that subject.
It is obvious, therefore,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Judson v. . Central Vermont R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Kellogg v. . N.Y.C. and Hudson R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Thompson v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Henavie v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Delaware L. & W. R. Co. v. RebmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Hardin v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Schuster v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Biondolillo v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Nelson v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.