Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Mike Yurosek & Son, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1995No. 93-70754PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) found that the company, Mike Yuro-sek & Son, Inc. (“Yurosek”), violated 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) by discharging four employees after they refused to obey their supervisor’s directive to work an extra hour. The Board held that the employees’ refusal to work constituted a protected concerted activity, and the Board ordered Yurosek to offer the employees reinstatement and back-pay. The Board now seeks enforcement of its order. We affirm the Board’s findings and grant enforcement of its order.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Mike Yurosek &…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wright Line, a Division of Wright Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. The National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Howard Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Cesar Moreno v. Utiliquest, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Griffin v. Jtsi, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
- Mayes v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Alton H. Piester, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.