Legal Opinion
State v. Burgos
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 4, 1995No. 13628PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals1 from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).2 On appeal, *406the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury on (a) the concurrence principle, (b) the defense of extreme emotional disturbance and (c) the effect of intoxication on intent, and (2) precluded the defendant from offering evidence of extreme emotional disturbance and intoxication at the hearing in probable cause.* *3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. DerricoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. ThurmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ChasseConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. MaiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. BaileyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. LatorreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.