Legal Opinion

State v. Maia

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. AC 16931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FREEDMAN, J.

The defendant, Derek Maia, appeals from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) charged the jury that intoxication was relevant only to negate the specific intent required for murder and failed to instruct that it could also be affirmative proof of recklessness for the lesser included offenses, (2) shifted and diluted the state’s burden of proof in its charge on intoxication, (3) charged the jury regarding the statutory definition of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. BolesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ChasseConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. State v. DebarrosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. State v. PorteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. State v. ColonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API