Legal Opinion

Millineum Maintenance Management, Inc. v. County of Lake

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 2008No. 2-07-0728PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant Fred Baird filed this interlocutory appeal in connection with a suit by plaintiffs Millineum Maintenance Management, Inc., and Capital Development Group, LLC, which sought among other things administrative review of the Lake County Board’s (Board) denial of their conditional-use permit application. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a de novo hearing to review the Board’s decision to deny them a conditional-use permit, but the court certified two questions of law pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308, which allows this court in its discretion to allow an interlocutory…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Condominium Ass'n of Commonwealth Plaza v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. World Painting Company v. CostiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Irshad Learning Center v. County of DuPageDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Irshad Learning Center v. County of DuPageDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. WORLD PAINTING CO., LLC v. CostiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API