Legal Opinion
United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 22, 1973No. 70-279PublishedCited by 447 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Appellees, two railroad companies, brought this action in the District Court for the Middle District of Florida to set aside the incentive per diem rates established by appellant Interstate Commerce Commission in a rule-making proceeding. Incentive Per Diem Charges — 1968, Ex parte No. 252 (Sub-No. 1), 337 I. C. C. 217 (1970). They challenged the order of the Commission on both substantive and procedural grounds. The District Court sustained appellees’ position that the Commission had failed to comply with the applicable provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. S. C. § 551 et…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by447 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
442 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.