In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Mulhall
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAMERON, Justice.
I. JURISDICTION
Michael Andrew Mulhall (Respondent), a member of the State Bar of Arizona (Bar), was charged with violating 17A A.R.S., Sup.Ct. Rules, rule 42, Rules of Professional Conduct (hereafter Ethical Rule (ER) -). The Hearing Committee (Committee) found Respondent had violated the Rules and recommended disbarment. The Disciplinary Commission of the State of Arizona (Commission) agreed and recommended to this court that Respondent be disbarred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), 17A A.R.S. Sup.Ct. Rules.
II. PREFACE
In disciplinary proceedings, this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, GalushaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re a Suspended Member of the State Bar of Arizona, BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona RedondoArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona RedondoArizona Supreme Court · 1993