Legal Opinion

In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Mulhall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1992No. SB-91-0041-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Michael Andrew Mulhall (Respondent), a member of the State Bar of Arizona (Bar), was charged with violating 17A A.R.S., Sup.Ct. Rules, rule 42, Rules of Professional Conduct (hereafter Ethical Rule (ER) -). The Hearing Committee (Committee) found Respondent had violated the Rules and recommended disbarment. The Disciplinary Commission of the State of Arizona (Commission) agreed and recommended to this court that Respondent be disbarred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), 17A A.R.S. Sup.Ct. Rules.

II. PREFACE

In disciplinary proceedings, this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, GalushaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Matter of SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re a Suspended Member of the State Bar of Arizona, BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona RedondoArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona RedondoArizona Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API