Legal Opinion

Matter of Smith

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1991No. SB-91-0014-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) recommended that respondent, Nile Baker Smith, be permanently disbarred from the practice of law, make restitution of $9,726.00 to 21 former clients, and pay costs in the amount of $4,010.36 to the State Bar of Arizona (Bar). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Sup.Ct. Rules, rule 53(e).

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Respondent practiced law in Phoenix, Arizona, and then left the state to places unknown. He made no arrangements for anyone to take over his practice and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, GalushaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re a Suspended Member of the State Bar of Arizona, BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MulhallArizona Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API