Bolmer v. Edsall
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On exception to master’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
This is an ex parte suit for annulment of a marriage. The special master has reported adversely and petitioner excepts.
The parties were married October 19th, 1917, and lived together little more than four weeks. They never had sexual relations.
The claim of the petitioner is that the wife before marriage conceived the idea of denying him sexual intercourse after marriage; never intended to permit him to copulate with her, and carried out that intent; that this constituted a fraud in a material part of the marriage contract and rendered it void.
The special master submits to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Clark v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
- Orens v. OrensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
- Rogers v. RogersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Anonymous v. AnonymousSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
- Lyannes v. LyannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Pisciotta v. BuccinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Williams v. WittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Sturm v. SturmNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.