Rogers v. Rogers
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
A decree of divorce nisi will be made in conformity with the advice contained in the conclusions of Advisory Master Church, which are hereby adopted as the opinion of the court.
As the case of Foote v. Foote, supra, is cited in the opinion of the learned master, I desire to call attention to a misleading-statement in syllabus 3. It is found in this expression: “Under a statute requiring corroborative evidence * * * to obtain a divorce,” &c. There is no statement in the body of the opinion that corroboration of the petitioner’s testimony in divorce cases is required by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Foote v. FooteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bolmer v. EdsallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- Shoemaker v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Timberlake's Administrator v. PughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Graves v. GravesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.