Legal Opinion
Pisciotta v. Buccino
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 21, 1952PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. Super. 114 (1952)
91 A.2d 629
CARMELLA PISCIOTTA, FALSELY NAMED CARMELLA BUCCINO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES PASQUALE BUCCINO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 6, 1952.
Decided October 21, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.
Mr. Benjamin M. Ratner argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Appellant sought an annulment of her marriage to respondent on the ground of fraud. After hearing, an adverse judgment was entered because of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bolmer v. EdsallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Lindquist v. LindquistNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Carris v. CarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1873
- Turney v. AveryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
- People ex rel. Smith v. HoffmanNew York Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. WittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Costello v. PorzeltNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Godfrey v. ShatwellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Bilowit v. DolitskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.