Legal Opinion
McInnis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 15, 1983No. 883-82PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TEAGUE, Judge.
The First Court of Appeals of Houston ordered appellant’s conviction reversed. It held that: (1) affidavits for a search warrant and an arrest warrant were invalid, and (2) a photograph depicting a used condom was erroneously admitted into evidence, and such was not harmless error. See McInnis v. State, 634 S.W.2d 912 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1982). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to make the determination whether the Court of Appeals correctly ordered appellant’s conviction reversed. Finding that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goehring v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- McInnis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Brady, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Vega v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- State v. KlimaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Raymond L. Searcy v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.