Legal Opinion
State v. Brady
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided December 15, 1988No. 13-88-105-CR, 13-88-106-CR, 13-88-110-CR and 13-88-111-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Justice.
Appellees Brady and Hankin were each individually charged in four separate infor-mations with promoting two allegedly obscene movies. The movies were seized under a search and arrest warrant issued by Justice of the Peace Tony Torres.
Before trial, appellees filed a motion to suppress the seized evidence. The trial court granted the motion. Pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (Vernon Supp.1988), the State appealed the trial court’s order suppressing the movies. Because the same allegedly invalid warrant is involved in all four cases, we will address…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stiggers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Timmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- State v. KlimaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Olivarri v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- State v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Wall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.