State v. Klima
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
The State appeals from an order suppressr ing all evidence, including some 180 mature marihuana plants, seized during a search of the farm where Sharon Klima lived with her codefendant, Paul Wilson.1 Finding that the suppressed evidence was all that supported the State’s case against Klima, the court also ordered the prosecution dismissed. In the first of two points of error, the State argues that the court erred because the marihuana plants were observed in plain view by officers in a helicopter and, thus, were susceptible'to seizure under the “open fields”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KlimaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- State v. KlimaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- State v. Sharon Klima, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997