Legal Opinion
Coyne v. Watson
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 19, 1967No. 6294PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
HOGAN, District Judge.
The petitioner, John E. Coyne, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. His claim is that a conviction and sentence in and by the Common Pleas Court of Clermont County, Ohio, pursuant to which he is being detained, was “imposed in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in that petitioner’s place of business was searched by police officers under color of a totally invalid and unlawful search…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- George McCreary v. Maurice SiglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- People v. GlaubmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.