Frazier v. Prince
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Cou,rt of Canadian County; before John C. Tarsney, District Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burwell, J.:
The first question that we will consider in this case is as to whether or not it is necessary to separately' list and assess each town lot in a town or city, or may they, when lying contiguous and owned by the same party, be assessed together under one valuation, which includes them all?
Lots numbered- 9, 10 and 11, in block numbered 94, in the city of El Reno, were sold for the taxes of 1893, to the plaintiff herein. There is- no contention between the parties to this -suit over the manner of assessing these 1-ofs for that year. The three lots were also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Glos v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Ames v. SankeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Ogden v. BemisIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Wade v. Crouch and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Keller v. HawkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Davenport v. DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Eldridge v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.