Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Prince

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1899PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from the District Cou,rt of Canadian County; before John C. Tarsney, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The first question that we will consider in this case is as to whether or not it is necessary to separately' list and assess each town lot in a town or city, or may they, when lying contiguous and owned by the same party, be assessed together under one valuation, which includes them all?

Lots numbered- 9, 10 and 11, in block numbered 94, in the city of El Reno, were sold for the taxes of 1893, to the plaintiff herein. There is- no contention between the parties to this -suit over the manner of assessing these 1-ofs for that year. The three lots were also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Glos v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ames v. SankeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ogden v. BemisIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Wade v. Crouch and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Keller v. HawkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Davenport v. DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Eldridge v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API