Legal Opinion

Matter of Hughes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1994No. 29S00-9305-DI-509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Disciplinary Commission has charged Respondent Robert E. Hughes with four counts of lawyer misconduct emanating from several fraudulent claims Respondent submitted to the Hamilton County Clerk-Treasurer while Respondent was judge of the Carmel (Ind.) City Court. This Court suspended Respondent pendente lite, pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 28(11), on March 11, 1994. The Hearing Officer in this matter, appointed pursuant to Ad-mis.Disc.R. 23(11), has tendered his findings of fact and conclusions of law, in which he found misconduct, but declined to…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Matter of GutmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Burge (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API