Legal Opinion

In Re Mears

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2000No. 45S00-9309-DI-987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

While serving as a judge of the Lake Superior Court, Juvenile Division, the respondent, Darlene W. Mears, improperly used members of her staff to perform personal tasks for her at times when they were being paid by the county. Today we approve a Conditional Agreement for Discipline, pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11, between the respondent and the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, which will result in respondent’s suspension from the practice of law for ninety (90) days for this professional misconduct. 1

The facts presented by the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Matter of HamptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matter of McDanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Matter of RiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In the Matter of Dwayne M. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indiana State Ethics Commission, Office of Inspector General, and David Thomas, in his Official Capacity as Inspector General v. Patricia SanchezIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In Re McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re ShullIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API