Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Leveyfilm, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan Bank & Trust

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 14, 1995No. 1-94-3016Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Cousins

I concur with the part of the majority opinion holding that the equitable lien claim set forth in appellant’s complaint was properly dismissed by the trial court. (See Pruitt Office Machines, Inc. v. Liberty National Bank (1950), 341 Ill. App. 146,149, 93 N.E.2d 104; Oppenheimer v. Szulerecki (1921), 297 Ill. 81, 87,130 N.E. 325.) However, in my opinion the majority errs in holding that the trial court erred in dismissing the mechanic’s lien claim set forth in count I of appellant’s complaint. As the appellant, Leveyfilm, Inc., sets forth in its complaint, this case arises out of a leasehold…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. SzulereckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Carey-Lombard Lumber Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Delaney Elec. Co., Inc. v. SchiessleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. La Salle National Bank v. Triumvera Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Boyer v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API