Legal Opinion

Carey-Lombard Lumber Co. v. Jones

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1900PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. R. W. Clifford, Judge, presiding. Appellant was petitioner in the circuit court of Cook county to enforce a lien against city lots in Chicago, owned by appellee J. Russell Jones, for lumber furnished to construct certain improvements thereon.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. R. W. Clifford, Judge, presiding. Appellant was petitioner in the circuit court of Cook county to enforce a lien against city lots in Chicago, owned by appellee J. Russell Jones, for lumber furnished to construct certain improvements thereon. Appellee Jones, and Elizabeth, his wife, together with T. C. Kane and David Meyer, were made defendants to the petition. Jones and wife alone answered, and upon replication a hearing was had, resulting in a decree…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

Section 1 of the Mechanic’s Lien law of this State in force June 26, 1895, (Hurd’s Stat. 1897, p. 1034,) provides: “That any person who shall by any contract with the owner of a lot or tract of land, or with one whom such owner has authorized or knowingly permitted to improve the same, furnish or specially manufacture and prepare materials, fixtures, apparatus, or machinery for the purpose of, or in building, altering, repairing or ornamenting any house or other building, * * * shall be known under this act as a contractor, and shall have a lien upon'the whole of such tract of land or lot and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. VanderbiltIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Burkitt v. . HarperNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Schmalz v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Hill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. R. Haas Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Springfield Amusement Park Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Dougherty-Moss Lumber Co. v. ChurchillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Merchants' Refrigerating Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  4. Boyer v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Crandall v. SorgIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API