Kee v. Lofton
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Abbott, C.J.:
The plaintiff, Eldon Kee, Jr., appeals from the entry of summary judgment against him and in favor of the defendants, Ewing Lofton and Lois Lofton. The trial court held that the statute of limitations barred the enforcement of a co-guaranty, and that an oral promise by the Loftons to pay their share of the note did not extend the statute of limitations.
When viewed as we must view a record where summary judgment has been entered (Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp., 238 Kan. 384, 390, 710 P.2d 1297 [1985]), the pertinent facts are as follows: Mid-America…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Bushnell v. BushnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Appleford v. Snake River Mining, Milling & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Bomud Co. v. Yockey Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Cipra v. SeegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kafka v. PopeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Uhlmann v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Kafka v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Emprise Bank v. RumisekCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Morris v. Jack B. Muir Irrevocable Trust (In Re Muir)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.