Legal Opinion

Bomud Co. v. Yockey Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 30, 1956No. 40,202PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This was an action to recover money from Yockey Oil Company, Inc., upon its open account, and from R. Pi. Osborn upon a written contract entered into with plaintiff March 30,1951. Yockey Oil Company, Inc., contended that the statute of limitations barred recovery against it; Osborn contended that pursuant to his contract he was a guarantor for the principal debtor, Yockey Oil Company, Inc., and that since the action was barred as to the principal, it was therefore barred as to himself, as guarantor. The trial court sustained Osborn’s motion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Reed v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Holden v. SpierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Fisher v. SpillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Colorado Savings Bank v. BalesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Iola State Bank v. BiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Murray v. Modoc State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Trego WaKeeney State Bank v. MaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API