Legal Opinion
State v. Van Sickle
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 1991No. 18863PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Terry Van Sickle was convicted of misdemeanor driving under the influence based on the state’s allegation that he had a breath-alcohol concentration in excess of .10 while operating his vehicle. I.C. § 18-8004. On appeal, the district court upheld the conviction. Appealing further, Van Sickle contends that the magistrate erred in overruling his objections to the admission of certain evidence concerning his breath-alcohol content. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
FACTS
On May 21, 1988, a Ketchum City police officer stopped Van Sickle for suspicion of driving while…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cole v. KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- Matter of McNeelyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- Swensen v. Buildings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. RuizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- State v. SevyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
- Wimbish v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- People v. DinardoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.