Legal Opinion

Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 6, 1992No. 91-1498PublishedCited by 319 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case, Harold and Ruth Katz allege that the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company intentionally concealed the existence of a liability policy issued by another insurance company, and that this concealment constituted a violation of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law and common law fraud. The district court granted summary judgment for Aetna. We will affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

Appellant Harold Katz was a passenger in a car being driven by Phyllis Appelbaum when an unknown motorist ran the car off…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by319 opinions

  1. Valerie Montone v. City of Jersey CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Rich v. StateDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  3. Johnson v. Metlife Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Hyde Athletic Industries, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey ex rel. Lander v. SchundlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API