Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

Without detailing the evidence it is sufficient to say that it falls short of making out a case against the defendant Porter. At least, the appellant, who is required to handle the laboring oar, has failed to overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailey Ex Rel. Bailey v. McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. . ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Kelly v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. LaNeve v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Frazier v. Piedmont & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Mangum v. . WinsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API