Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Piedmont & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

The petition for removal, besides showing the presence of the requisite jurisdictional amount, asserts a right of removal on the grounds of diverse citizenship, and alleges that the resident defendant has been fraudulently joined to prevent such removal.

The trial court held that the case was controlled by the line of decisions of which Cox v. Lamber Co., 193 N. C., 28, 136 S. E., 254, Johnson v. Lumber Co., 189 N. C., 81, 126 S. E., 165, and Rea v. Mirror Co., 158 N. C., 24, 73 S. E., 116, may be cited as fairly illustrative; while the appellant contends that the principles…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Rea v. Standard Mirror Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. State v. . ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Will of WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API