Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for removal, besides showing the presence of the requisite jurisdictional amount, asserts rights of removal on the grounds of diverse citizenship and (1) fraudulent joinder of resident defendants, and (2) separable controversies.

The trial court held that as the allegations of the complaint all point to the failure of the corporate defendant to discharge its nondelegable duty to furnish plaintiff, an employee, a reasonably safe place to work, the ease was controlled by the line of decisions of which Cox v. Lbr. Co., 193 N. C., 28, 136 S. E., 254; Johnson v. Lbr. Co., 189 N. C.,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Rea v. Standard Mirror Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Givens v. Savona Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Cox v. Whitmer-Parsons Pulp & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Johnson v. Blackwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Cole v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API