Legal Opinion

Mangum v. . Winstead

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

In the face of the verdict, which is not challenged by the appeal, it- would be singular if the plaintiff should also recover in the instant case. One who causes or contributes to- an injury by his own negligence is not entitled to damages therefor. Neither plaintiff nor defendant is permitted to recover for injuries resulting from a collision when the negligence of each contributed thereto as a proximate cause. Construction Co. v. R. R., 184 N. C., 179, 113 S. E., 672. It follows, therefore, that the judgment of nonsuit on plaintiff’s cause of action, which seems correct upon the evidence,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Poindexter v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Bailey Ex Rel. Bailey v. McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Absher v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API