Legal Opinion

Reed v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 2000No. 98-06-29827M; CA A103983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) decision that postponed his release date. Plaintiff also appeals the trial court’s imposition of $475 in attorney fees payable to the Indigent Defense Fund.

During the pendency of this appeal, plaintiff was released on parole. The state moved to dismiss the first two assignments of error as moot because each assignment argued that plaintiff was unlawfully imprisoned. Plaintiff concedes that these assignments are now moot. We agree. See Barnes v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Antunez v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Butler v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Braun v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Brewer v. ReubartDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API