Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Pusey

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1919No. L. A. No. 5922PublishedCited by 43 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. C. D. Latourette, R. T. Williams and A. W. Rutan for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

For the third time this case is here on appeal. The question heretofore presented and now again presented for review involves the correctness of an order of the low-er court admitting the will of Gertrude C. Pusey to probate upon the petition of the respondent, S. H. Finley. The appellants are Henry F. Pusey, who contested the probate of the will, and C. S. Crookshank, who, as nominee of the said Henry F. Pusey, petitioned for letters of administration upon the estate of the deceased. These appellants now, as heretofore, contend that the will in question was revoked by the marriage of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Harpold v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Crouch v. CrouchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API