Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2006No. 76625-8PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Madsen, J.

Matthew Williams challenges his conviction for possession of an unlawful firearm pursuant to RCW 9.41.190. Williams claims that instruction 11, the “to convict” instruction, was a misstatement of the law because it failed to inform the jury that in order to convict him, it must find he knew the characteristics of the firearm that made it unlawful under RCW 9.41.190. We hold the State must prove that a defendant knows, or should know, the characteristics of the firearm that make it unlawful.

¶2 Nevertheless, we conclude that the defect in instruction 11 was harmless. There is no…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Parker v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API