State v. Brown
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
— This case determines whether an erroneous accomplice liability jury instruction is subject to harmless error analysis, and if so, whether the instruction was harmless in these consolidated appeals. We hold that an erroneous jury instruction may be subject to harmless error analysis if the error does not relieve the State of its burden to prove each element of the crime charged. An erroneous instruction is harmless if, from the record in a given case, it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained. The analysis must be completed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.