Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1993No. 689-93PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of criminal trespass. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.05. The Court of Appeals found the evidence insufficient, reversed the judgment of the trial court and ordered an acquittal. Arnold v. State, No. 01-91-1141-CR, 1993 WL 93451 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] April 1, 1993) (Not published). The State has filed a petition for discretionary review contending that proof of ownership under Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 1.07, namely, a greater right to possession of the property, is sufficient to support a conviction for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Langston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bader v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
  3. Anthony v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. Sparkman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
  5. Crunk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API