Legal Opinion

Gray v. Hammond Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff, by her amended complaint, alleges, among other things, that the defendant Hammond Lumber Company is a corporation, and that defendant Lukins is its foreman and in charge of the work in which Harold Cray and the defendant corporation were engaged at the time of the accident; that on the day of the accident the corporation was operating a sawmill at Mill City, Linn County, Oregon, in the manufacture of lumber from saw logs supplied by the corporation from its logging camp in that county, and that Cray was employed by the corporation in that logging camp; that while thus employed he…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Camenzind v. Freeland Furniture Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hepp v. Quickel Auto & Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lopez v. TownsendNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API