Legal Opinion

Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1948No. 34,868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to comply with the mandate of this court pursuant to the decision made in Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. 223 Minn. 550, 27 N. W. (2d) 641.

In the foregoing decision, the trial court was reversed and the case remanded for the amendment of findings of fact and conclusions of law and for the entry of judgment in accordance therewith. Subsequently, on August 12, 1948, the trial court made and filed its amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment, contrary — as more particularly hereinafter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Malcolmson v. Goodhue County National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Personal Loan Co. v. Personal Finance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Kelmar Corp. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. State ex rel. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Jallen v. AgreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API