Legal Opinion

Jallen v. Agre

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1963No. 38,345, 39,095PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to comply with the mandate of this court in the decision in Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 119 N. W. (2d) 739.

The facts are stated fully in the above opinion. The case involved the validity of an alleged settlement of the action. After the mandate of this court affirming a decision of the trial court denying a motion for a new trial was returned to the trial court, an ex parte application was made by plaintiff for judgment against the insurers of defendants. On April 24, 1963, the court issued its order directing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jallen v. AgreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halverson v. Village of DeerwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Bafico v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API