Legal Opinion

Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1942No. 33,135PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

We have dealt with this case before in Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co. 210 Minn. 164, 298 N. W. 37, 40, 135 A. L. R. 833. We were then reviewing an order denying a motion by Alfred A. Lenhart, as a minority stockholder on behalf of defendant corporation, to set aside for fraud a default judgment against the corporation in favor of one of its officers. The motion was denied, but we reversed with the comment that “upon no theory was the action below justified.” We added explicit “directions to try the controversy upon the merits of the proposed answer.”

The proposed answer so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geisberg v. O'LaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Reid v. Independent Union of All WorkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Bennett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Personal Loan Co. v. Personal Finance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API